<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id" xml:lang="en">Codex manuscriptus</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Codex manuscriptus</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn publication-format="print">2949-0510</issn>
      <issn publication-format="electronic">2949-0502</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name xml:lang="en">IWL RAS</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.22455/CM.2949-0510-2024-5-199-221</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="article-type" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading" xml:lang="en">
          <subject>Articles</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>“Classics” and “Classical” in Soviet Science of Literature: Formalists and Comparativists (Side Notes)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <name name-style="western" xml:lang="en">
            <surname>Tsyganov</surname>
            <given-names>Dmitry M.</given-names>
          </name>
          <email>codeximli@yandex.ru</email>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2024-07-09" publication-format="electronic">
          <day>09</day>
          <month>07</month>
          <year>2024</year>
        </pub-date>
      </pub-date>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>199</fpage>
      <lpage>221</lpage>
      <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
        <kwd>intellectual history</kwd>
        <kwd>classics</kwd>
        <kwd>classical</kwd>
        <kwd>literary canon</kwd>
        <kwd>OPOJAZ</kwd>
        <kwd>formalism</kwd>
        <kwd>early Soviet humanities</kwd>
        <kwd>ideology and philology</kwd>
        <kwd>Stalinist culture</kwd>
        <kwd>Viktor M. Zhirmunsky</kwd>
        <kwd>Yuri N. Tynyanov</kwd>
        <kwd>Viktor B. Shklovsky</kwd>
        <kwd>Boris M. Eichenbaum</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2026, IWL RAS</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      </permissions>
      <abstract>This article is devoted to several specific aspects of the problem of the Soviet literary canon — the question of the semantic content of the notions of “classics” and “classical” and the ideas of “cultural inheritance” and “literary evolution” in the humanitarian thought of the 1920s. The subject of the study are the intellectual constructs of Viktor M. Zhirmunsky, Yuri N. Tynyanov, Viktor B. Shklovsky, Boris M. Eichenbaum and other early Soviet theorists, whose thinking was connected with the definition of the main parameters of not only the “former” but also the “new” culture. Through the examination of scientific-theoretical texts, taking into account the personal pragmatics of the writer and the political- ideological framework set by the authorities, we seek to discover and describe the mechanisms through which intellectual speculation was carried out that allowed the Stalinist regime to put culture at the service of its own ideological interests. The considerations contained in this article are intended, first and foremost, to shed light on the processes of redefining the “classical” literary canon that took place in the first post-revolutionary decade.</abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="B1">
        <label>1.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Vinogradov, V.V. Stil’ Pushkina [Pushkin’s Style]. Moscow, Gosizdat Publ., 1941. 620 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <label>2.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zhirmunskii, M. Voprosy teorii literatury: Stat’i 1916–1926 godov [Questions of the Theory of Literature: Articles of 1916–1926]. Leningrad, Academia Publ., 1928. 356 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <label>3.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zhirmunskii, M. “Sravnitel’noe  literaturovedenie  i  problema literaturnykh vliianii” [“Comparative Literature Studies and the Problem of Literary Influences”]. Izvestiia Akademii nauk SSSR. Otdelenie obshchestvennykh nauk, no. 3, 1936, pp. 383–403. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <label>4.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Zenkin, N. Raboty o teorii [Works on Theory]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2012. 552 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <label>5.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Izdanie khudozhestvennoi literatury v RSFSR v 1919–1924 : Putevoditel’ po Fondu Gosizdata [Publishing Fiction in the RSFSR in 1919–1924: Guide to the Gosizdat Fund], comp. L.M. Kresina, E.A. Dinershtein. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 2009. 463 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <label>6.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Izdatel’skoe delo v pervye gody Sovetskoi (1917–1922): sbornik dokumentov i materialov [Publishing in the First Years of Soviet Power. (1917– 1922): Collection of Documents and Materials], comp. E.A. Dinershtein, T.P. Iavorskaia. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1972. 240 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <label>7.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Plotnikov, S., and N.P. Podzemsky, and Iu.N. Iakimenko, editors. Iskusstvo kak iazyk — iazyki iskusstva: Gosudarstvennaia akademiia khudozhestvennykh nauk i esteticheskaia teoriia 1920-kh godov: in 2 t. [Art as a Language — Languages of Art: The State Academy of Artistic Sciences and Aesthetic Theory of the 1920s: in 2 vols.], vol. 2. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2017. 920 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <label>8.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Istoriia knigi v SSSR, 1917–1921: v 3 t. [History of the Book in the USSR, 1917–1921: in 3 ]. Moscow, Kniga Publ., 1983–1986. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <label>9.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Dobrenko, A., and G. Tikhanov, editors. Istoriia russkoi literaturnoi kritiki: Sovetskaia i postsovetskaia epokhi [History of Russian Literary Criticism: Soviet and Post-Soviet Epochs]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2011. 792 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <label>10.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Kalinin, A. “Istoriia literatury kak Familienroman (russkii formalizm mezhdu Edipom i Gamletom)” [“History of Literature as Familienroman (Russian Formalism between Oedipus and Hamlet)”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, no. 4 (80), 2006, pp. 64–83. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <label>11.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Moskovskaia, S. “‘Klassovoe’ i ‘klassicheskoe’ v proletarskoi kritike rannesovetskogo vremeni” [“‘Class’ and ‘Classical’ in Proletarian Criticism of Early Soviet Time”]. Popova, I.L., editor. Kliuchevoe slovo klassika: Teoriia, istoriia, literaturnaia politika [Keyword Classics: Theory, History, Literary Policy]. Moscow, IWL RAS Publ., (in print).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <label>12.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Nusinov, M. Problema istoricheskogo romana: V. Giugo i A. Frans [Problem of the Historical Novel: V. Hugo and A. France]. Moscow, Leningrad, Gosizdat Publ., 1927. 319 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <label>13.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Pil’shchikov, A., and A.B. Ustinov. “Poverkhnostnoe napriazhenie: Istoriia kul’tury i kontseptsiia ‘literaturnogo byta’ B.M. Eikhenbauma [“Surface Tension: The History of Culture and the Concept of ‘Literary Byt’ by Boris M. Eichenbaum”]. Rhema, Rema, no. 4, 2020, pp. 9–22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.31862/2500-2953-2020-4-9-22</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <label>14.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Tynianov, N. Arkhaisty i novatory [Archaists and Innovators]. [Leningrad], Priboi Publ., 1929. 595 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <label>15.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Tynianov, N. Poetika. Istoriia literatury. Kino [Poetics. History of literature. Cinema]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1977. 574 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <label>16.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Tsyganov, M. “Oproshchenie stalinizma: Esteticheskie i politicheskie smysly sovetskoi kul’tury 1920–1950-kh gg.” [“Oproschenie Stalinism: Aesthetic and Political Meanings of Soviet Culture 1920–1950s”]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2023, no. 4 (182), pp. 350–359. (In Russ.) https:// doi.org/10.53953/08696365_2023_182_4_350</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <label>17.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Shklovskii, B. Gamburgskii schet: Stat’i — vospominaniia — esse (1914– 1933) [Gamburgskii Schet: Articles — Memoirs — Essays (1914–1933)]. Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1990. 544 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <label>18.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Shomrakova, A. “Formirovanie printsipov izdaniia russkoii klassicheskoi literatury v Gosizdate (1919–1929 gg.)” [“Formation of the Principles of Russian Classical Literature in Gosizdat (1919–1929)”]. Zazerskii, E.Ia., editor. Knizhnoe delo Peterburga — Petrograda — Leningrada [The Book Business of Petersburg — Petrograd — Leningrad]. Leningrad, Leningrad State Institute of Culture Publ., 1981, pp. 111–125. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <label>19.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Eikhenbaum, B.M. O literature [On Literature]. Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1987. 540 p. (In Russ.)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <label>20.</label>
        <mixed-citation>Oittinen, Vesa, and Elina Viljanen, Stalin Era Intellectuals: Culture and Stalinism. London, New York, Routledge Publ., 2023. xiv, 270 p. (In English)</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>
